Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-05-08 House Journal Page 1743 HB 132 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 1708) on the following at this time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 132(2d RLS)(efd am) "An Act relating to the possession, distribution, importation, and transportation of alcohol in a local option area; requiring liquor license applicants to submit fingerprints for the purpose of conducting a criminal history background check, and relating to the use of criminal justice information by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to the offenses of operating a motor vehicle, aircraft, or watercraft while intoxicated and refusal to take a breath test; relating to implied consent to take a chemical test; relating to presumptions arising from the amount of alcohol in a person's breath or blood; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 132(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 132(2d RLS)(efd am), thus adopting SCS CSHB 132(FIN), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 132(2d RLS)(efd am)?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 132(FIN) Concur YEAS: 36 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 4 2001-05-08 House Journal Page 1744 Yeas: Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Absent: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Mulder And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 132(FIN). Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the legislative letter of intent. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk was instructed to so notify the Senate. SCS CSHB 132(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.